ADEMU (A Dynamic Economic and Monetary Union) is part of the Horizon 2020 work program topic Resilient and sustainable economic and monetary union in Europe (EURO-1-2014). The primary focus of the project is on the dimension The impact of macroeconomic and social imbalances on economic stability.

In response to the European debt crisis and associated deep recession, a number of important steps have recently been taken towards redesigning the institutional architecture of EMU, based on the roadmap outlined in the Van Rompuy Report (2012). But these institutional innovations – in particular the ‘fiscal compact’, the ESM, the SSM and the SRM – retain relatively weak theoretical foundations. In particular, there is a noticeable gap between policy-oriented analyses of the precise EU challenges, and the major developments in dynamic macroeconomic theory of the past three decades.

ADEMU brings together eight research groups from leading European institutions with the aim of closing this gap. It studies the overall monetary and fiscal structure of the EU and the euro area, and the mechanisms of fiscal policy coordination among member states, with specific focus on:

  1. ensuring the long-term sustainability of EMU, addressing issues such as debt overhang, fiscal consolidation, public debt management, risk-sharing within the union, and crisis management mechanisms;
  2. building resilience to economic shocks, with special emphasis on the coordination of fiscal policies, fiscal multipliers and labor market risks; and
  3. managing interdependence in the euro area, analyzing both fiscal and financial spillovers and the effects of macroeconomic imbalances on financial and money markets, and, to confront these issues, new forms of banking regulation and monetary policy.

ADEMU is at the frontier of dynamic macroeconomic research, and the project will generate new knowledge that will be used to provide a rigorous assessment of the current institutional framework, and detailed proposals for improving it. It will also be a focal point in debates among academics, policymakers and other stakeholders regarding the implementation of new policies. The scope of the project will include a full consideration of political economy and legal dimensions to alternative institutional reforms.

Main Objective

To conduct a rigorous investigation of risks to the long-run sustainability of EMU, and to develop detailed institutional proposals aimed at mitigating these risks.

Specific Objectives

  1. To clarify the determinants of sovereign debt crises, to develop new indicators that could be used to assess the risk of such crises occurring, and to devise new strategies for reducing this risk.
  2. To devise credible rules and strategies for sustainable public debt management appropriate to the institutional and demographic characteristics of the EU/euro area.
  3. To provide detailed institutional proposals for optimal fiscal risk-sharing among EMU member states, subject to the constraint that participation cannot be enforced, and to contrast these proposals with the existing institutional framework (e.g. the ESM).

ADEMU Work Packages

Graphical representation of ADEMU Work Packages


 Details of the work packages:

WP1: Long-term sustainability of a monetary and fiscal union

Focus on the long-run sustainability of EMU – in particular the sustainability of sovereign debt, and of union-wide burden-sharing mechanisms.

WP2: Stabilization policy in currency unions

Assessment of the short-run stabilising potential of alternative approaches to conducting fiscal policy in a currency union, so as to improve resilience to macroeconomic shocks.

WP3: Macroeconomic and financial imbalances and spillovers

Focus on the macroeconomic and financial interdependencies that are of relevance to reformed institutional governance of the euro area. Attention is placed on two specific categories: international spillovers, particularly those associated with fiscal policy, and macroeconomic and financial imbalances.

WP4: Policy Implementation

Assess the practical hurdles associated with implementing institutional reforms for the better management of fiscal policy within the EU, with a particular focus on the legal, political and behavioural constraints that the current EMU fiscal institutional structure – and, in particular, the alternative ADEMU proposals – may face.


  • Ábrahám, A., N. Pavoni and S. Koehne (2011). On the First Order Approach in Principal-Agent Models with Hidden Borrowing and Lending, Journal of Economic Theory, 2011, 1331-1361.
  • Ábrahám, A., E. Carceles-Poveda and R. Marimon (2014). On the optimal design of a Financial Stability Fund, May (work in progress).
  • Albagli, Elias, Hellwig, Christian, and Tsyvinski, Aleh (2011). A Theory of Asset Pricing Based on Heterogeneous Information. NBER Working Paper No. 17548.
  • Albagli, Elias, Hellwig, Christian, and Tsyvinski, Aleh (2014). Dynamic Dispersed Information and the Credit Spread Puzzle. NBER Working Paper No. 19788.
  • Allen, L. and A. Saunders (1986). The Large–Small Bank Dichotomy in the Federal Funds Market. Journal of Banking and Finance 10, 219-230.
  • Anat, A. and M. Hellwig (2012). The Bankers’ New Clothes: What’s Wrong with Banking and What to Do about It. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Andrés, J. et al. (2009). A Proposal to Restart the Spanish Labor Market. http://crisis09.es/PDF/restart-the-labor-market.pdf
  • Arellano, Cristina (2008). “Default Risk and Income Fluctuations in Emerging Economies, American Economic Review 98(3): 690-712.
  • Atkeson, Andrew. “International lending with moral hazard and risk of repudiation” Econometrica 59 no. 4 (1991): 1069-1089.
  • Auerbach A. and Gorodnichenko Y. 2012. “Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4, 1—27.
  • Auerbach, A. J. and Y. Gorodnichenko (2012). Output spillovers from fiscal policy. NBER working paper 18578.
  • Baldacci, Emmanuele, James McHugh, and Iva Petrova (2011), “Measuring Fiscal Vulnerability and Fiscal Stress”. Working Paper 11/94, Washington DC: IMF
  • Barnhill, Theodore M., and George Kopits (2004), “Assessing Fiscal Sustainability under Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk 6, 31-53
  • Barth, James A., Gerard Caprio, Jr. and Ross Levine (2012). The Evolution and Impact of Bank Regulation. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6288, December 2012.
  • Beaudry, Paul et Franck Portier. Understanding Non-Inflationary Demand Driven Business Cycles. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 2013, Volume 28.
  • Bernanke, B. S. and Gertler, M. (1989). Agency Cost, Net Worth and Business Fluctuations. American Economic Review (79) 1: 14-31.
  • Bernoth, Kerstin, Hagen, Jürgen von, and Schuknecht, Ludger (2012). Sovereign Risk Premiums in the European Bonds Market. Journal of International Money and Finance 31(5): 975-995.
  • Bi, Huxin, and Eric M. Leeper (2013), “Analyzing Fiscal Sustainability.” Mimeo, Indiana University Department of Economics.
  • Bloom, Nicholas (2009). The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks. Econometrica 77 (3): 623 – 685.
  • Boeri, Tito and Garibaldi, Pietro (2008). Un Nuovo Contratto per Tutti, Chiarelettere, Torino.
  • Bohacek, Radim (2006). Financial Constraints and Entrepreneurial Investment. Journal of Monetary Economics (53). 2195-2212.
  • Bova, Elva, Robert Dippelsman, Kara Rideout, and Andrea Schaechter (2013), “Another Look at Governments’ Balance Sheets: The Role of Nonfinancial Assets.” Working Paper 13/95, Washington DC: IMF.
  • Brender, A., and A. Drazen. 2005. “Political Budget Cycles in New Versus Established Democracies,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(7), 1271-1295
  • Brender, A., and A. Drazen. 2008. “How do Budget Deficit and Economic Growth Affect Reelection Prospect? – Evidence from a Large Cross-Section of Countries,” American Economic Review, 98(5), 2203–20.
  • Brunnermeier, Markus and Pedersen, L. H. (2009). Market liquidity and funding liquidity. Review of Financial Studies (22) 6: 2201-2238.
  • Cahuc, Pierre and Kramarz,Francis (2004). De la précarité à la mobilité, vers une sécurité sociale professionnelle, Rapport pour le Ministre de l’Economie et des Finances. http://ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/rapports-publics/054000092/index.shtml
  • Calvo, Guillermo (1988). Servicing the Public Debt: The Role of Expectations. American Economic Review 78(4): 647-661.
  • Canova, F. and E. Pappa (2011). Fiscal Policy, Pricing Frictions and Monetary Accommodation, Economic Policy, 26(68), pp. 555-598.
  • Christiano, Lawrence, Motto, Roberto, and Rostagno, Massimo (2010). Financial Factors in Economic Fluctuations. Working Paper Series No. 1192, European Central Bank.
  • Christiano, Lawrence, Eichenbaum, Martin and Rebelo, Sergio (2011). When is the government spending multiplier large? Journal of Political Economy (119) 1: 78–121.
  • Cole, Harold, and Kehoe, Timothy (2000). Self-Fulfilling Debt Crises. Review of Economic Studies 67(1): 91-116.
  • Cooper, Russell (2012). Fragile Debt and the Credible Sharing of Strategic Uncertainty. Mimeo.
  • Corsetti, Giancarlo, Dedola, Luca (2012). The Mystery of the Printing Press: Self-fulfilling Debt Crises and Monetary Sovereignty. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 9358.
  • Corsetti, Giancarlo, Kuester, Keith, Meier, André, and Müller, Andre (2013). Sovereign Risk, Fiscal Policy, and Macroeconomic Stability. Economic Journal 123(566): F99-F132.
  • Cottarelli, Carlos (2011), “The Risk Octagon: A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Sovereign Risks.” http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/news/2011/docs/Cottarelli1.pdf
  • Cui, W., and S. Radde (2014).: Search-based Endogenous Illiquidity and the Macro,” working paper, DIW Berlin.
  • Dawson, Mark and de Witte, Floris, ‘Constitutional Balance in the EU after the Euro-crisis’, 76 Modern Law Review (2013) p. 817-844;
  • De Witte, Bruno and Beukers, Thomas, ‘The Court of Justice approves the creation of the European Stability Mechanism outside the EU legal order: Pringle’, 50 Common Market Law Review (2013) p. 805-848;
  • Diamond, P. A. (1982): “Aggregate Demand Management in Search Equilibrium,” Journal of Political Economy, 90(5), 881–94.
  • Diamond, P. A. (1982). Wage Determination and Efficiency in Search Equilibrium, The Review of Economic Studies, 49(2), 217-27.
  • Diaz-Giménez, J., G. Giovannetti Ramon Marimon, and P.Teles (2008). Nominal Debt as a Burden of Monetary Policy, Review of Economic Dynamics, 11, 3, 493-514.
  • European Central Bank (2013). Financial Stability Review, November 2013.
  • EU MIP Report (2014). Report From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Central Bank And The European Economic And Social Committee. Alert Mechanism Report 2014. Statistical Annex 2014.
  • Farhi, Emmanuel and Ivan Werning. “Fiscal Unions.” working paper, MIT (2013)
  • Fudenberg D. and D.K. Levine (1993). Self-Confirming Equilibrium. Econometrica 61, n.3, pp.523-545.
  • Gaballo, G. and R. Marimon (2014). Breaking the Spell with Credit-Easing: Self-Confirming Credit Crises in Competitive Search Economies, European University Institute, May (work in progress).
  • Galí, Jordi and Monacelli, Tommaso (2008). Optimal monetary and fiscal policy in a currency union. Journal of International Economics (76) 1: 116-132.
  • Geanakoplos, John (2009). The Leverage Cycle. NBER Macroeconomic Annual 2009 (24) 1-65
  • Geanakoplos, John (2011). What Is Missing From Macroeconomics: Endogenous Leverage And Default. Cowles Foundation Paper 1332.
  • Gertler, M. and P. Karadi (2011). A model of unconventional monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 58(1), pp.17-34.
  • Gilchrist, Simon, Sim, Jae, and Zakrajšek, Egon (2014). Uncertainty, Financial Frictions, and Investment Dynamics. NBER Working Paper No. 20038.
  • Gottardi, P and R. Rahi (2013). Risk Sharing and Retrading in Incomplete Markets, Economic Theory 54 (2), 287-304.
  • Gray, Dale, Cheng Hoon Lim, Elena Loukoianova, and Samuel Malone (2008), “A Risk-Based Debt Sustainability Framework: Incorporating Balance Sheets and Uncertainty.” Working Paper 08/40, Washington DC: IMF
  • Guerrieri, V., and G. Lorenzoni (2009): “Liquidity and Trading Dynamics,” Econometrica, 77(6), 1751–1790.
  • Hagen, Jürgen von (2013). Fault Lines in the Public Sector. Paper presented at the IMF First Statistical Forum, Washington DC.
  • Hansen, Gary D. and Imrohoroglu, Ayse (1992). The role of unemployment insurance in an economy with liquidity constraints and moral hazard. Journal of Political Economy 100 (1): 118–142.
  • Hansen, P.R., Z. Huang, and H. Shek (2012). Realized GARCH: a joint model for returns and realized measures of volatility. Journal of Applied Econometrics Vol. 27 pp. 877-906.
  • Hansen, P.R., A. Lunde, and V. Voev (2013). Realized Beta GARCH: A Multivariate GARCH Model with Realized Measures of Volatility. Journal of Applied Econometrics (forthcoming).
  • Hernández de Cos, P. and Moral-Benito, E. 2011. “Endogenous fiscal consolidations,” Banco de España Working Papers 1102, Banco de España.
  • Ho, T. and A. Saunders (1985). A Micro Model of the Federal Funds Market. Journal of Finance 40, 977–988.
  • Kapička, Marek. “Efficient allocations in dynamic private information economies with persistent shocks: A first-order approach.” The Review of Economic Studies 80, no. 3 (2013): 1027-1054.
  • Kenen, Peter. “The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View.” In R.A. Mundell and A.K. Swoboda, eds., Monetary Problems of the International Economy, Chicago University Press (1969)
  • Kilpatrick, Claire and De Witte. Bruno (eds.), ‘Social Rights in Times of Crisis in the Eurozone: The Role of Fundamental Rights’ Challenges’, EUI Working Papers, LAW 2014/05, p. 1-126;
  • Kiyotaki, N., and J. Moore (2012). Liquidity, Business Cycles, and Monetary Policy, NBER Working Paper, 17934.
  • Kocherlakota, Narayana R. “Implications of efficient risk sharing without commitment.” The Review of Economic Studies 63, no. 4 (1996): 595-609.
  • Kopits, George (2014), “Fiscal Risks: New Approaches to Identification, Management and Mitigation.” Working Paper, OECD Working Group of Senior Budget Officials.
  • Krusell, Per, Quadrini, Vincenzo, and Rios-Rull, Victor (1997). Politico-economic equilibrium and economic growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21 (1): 243–272.
  • Krusell, Per and Smith, Anthony A (1998). Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Macroeconomy, Journal of Political Economy 106 (5): 867 – 896.
  • Levine, D. and T. Palfrey (2007). The Paradox of Voter Participation: A Laboratory Study,” American Political Science Review, 101: 143-158, 2007.
  • Marcet, A. and R. Marimon (2011). Recursive Contracts. European University Institute, MWP, 2011/03, ECO, 2011/15, Barcelona GSE WP 552.
  • Nordhaus, W.D., A. Alesina, and C.L. Schultze. 1989. “Alternative Approaches to the Political Business Cycle,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 1-68.
  • Pappa, E. 2009. “The effects of fiscal expansions: an international comparison,” Working Papers 409, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics.
  • Persson, T., and G. Tabellini. 2003. The Economic Effect of Constitutions: “What Do the Data Say?” Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ravn, Morten O., Stephanie Schmitt-Groh é, and Martin Uribe (2012), “Consumption, Government Spending, and the Real Exchange Rate.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 59, 215–234.
  • Ravn, Morten O. and Vincent Sterk (2013), “Job Uncertainty and Deep Recessions”, working paper, University College London.
  • Roch, Francisco, and Uhlig, Harald (2011). The Dynamics of Sovereign Debt Crises and Bailouts. Mimeo.
  • Sargent T. J. (2010). Where to draw the lines: stability vs. efficiency. New York University.
  • Shi, M., and J. Svensson. 2006. “Political Budget Cycles: Do They Differ Across Countries and Why?” Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1367-1389.
  • Smets F. and Wouters R. 2007. “Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian Approach”, American Economic Review, 97, 586—606.
  • Straub, Ludwig, and Ulbricht, Robert (2013). Credit Crunches, Information Failures, and the Persistence of Pessimism. Mimeo.
  • Thomas, Jonathan and Tim Worrall. “Income fluctuation and asymmetric information: An example of a repeated principal-agent problem.” Journal of Economic Theory 51, no.2 (1990): 367-390.
  • Tuori, Kaarlo and Tuori, Klaus, The Eurozone Crisis. A Constitutional Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2014) p. 1-296.
  • Woodford, Michael (2011). Simple Analytics of the Government Expenditure Multiplier. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (3) 1: 1–35.